Drone jammers and counter-UAS systems handheld, man-portable and vehicle systems: detect, jam, divert

No, and no supplier can guarantee it. Range depends on line of sight, terrain, buildings, humidity and the airframe itself: the same unit gives a difference of several times over between open ground and dense urban fabric.

That is why we quote an operating band (1–3 km) and record in the test report the conditions under which it was measured. If the figure is lower at your site, that is a configuration question rather than a false claim, and it is solved with antennas and mounting positions.

It depends which link is denied. With control and telemetry denied, the airframe usually enters return-to-home or lands in place. With the video link denied, the pilot loses the picture but keeps control.

Spoofing works differently: the aircraft is not brought down, it is drawn in a given direction or blocked from entering a zone. For sites where a falling drone is dangerous in itself — over people, over a process unit — that difference is the whole point.

Yes, and that is the normal case. The system needs no rebuild of what you have: it either works standalone or feeds your control room. During assessment we look at camera positions and the perimeter route so the antenna does not end up in a dead zone.

By task, not by budget. Handheld — response to a signal and work on a specific target. Backpack — covering a sector where you need both detection and effect, and where a vehicle cannot go. Vehicle — continuous watch of the far approaches with no operator at a console.

The right answer is often a combination: a fixed or vehicle loop on the perimeter plus a handheld in the response team.

Jamming is directional and switched on band by band, not all at once: the operator or the automation works on the frequencies the target uses. That is exactly why the band list is fixed against the site environment.

Radiating equipment still needs clearance from your radio authority — we neither skip that step nor advise skipping it.

In most jurisdictions yes, and the procedure differs: in some places it is frequency clearance, in others a permit for countermeasure use. We do not act as a regulator and do not promise to "clear everything".

What we do: supply technical characteristics to the extent your document package needs, and state in the contract that the operator determines the procedure of use.

Batteries, antennas and mounts are consumables; the set is agreed at order. The maintenance schedule ships with the operating manual: it describes what is checked before every switch-on and what is checked quarterly.

Because a figure without measurement conditions means nothing. "Up to 3 km" can be obtained over open ground with one antenna and one airframe, or under the real conditions of your site.

Our test is simple: ask the supplier for a test report stating the conditions — terrain, mounting height, airframe type, what was used to measure. No report means no measurement, and the figure came from a catalogue. That applies to us too: we hand over a report for your configuration.

No, and nobody can. The system lowers the probability and buys reaction time; it is not a dome that seals a site.

The contract fixes measurable values: detection and jamming range under stated conditions, deployment time, operator procedure. Those we stand behind. "Absolute protection" is not something any supplier in the world can stand behind.

It depends on configuration: a standard band set builds faster, a non-standard one has to be manufactured. Lead time is fixed in the contract after the specification is agreed — we do not quote it before that, so the date does not move afterwards.